'A Visual Society' and 'A Photo Editor' both picked up on my 'Want to stand out in a crowd' post and have expanded upon it. Their writing and the follow up commentary contains plenty of sound advice for us all. My rambling was meant as a follow up to some of the other web chatter concerning getting noticed and standing out in a crowded market place. It wasn't meant to be so much about the color of my bags or size of my portfolio but was about trying to make smart and intelligent choices for oneself and ones work.
By the way the reason I have orange bags is quite simple and practical. When I was starting out I used to deliver and pick up the book myself. It was hard for me to get meetings so I would join the crowd and throw my portfolio in the ring on the assigned drop off day. After a couple of times doing this and having my share of messenger center woes I figured a little color wouldn't go amiss seeing as my then black bag was indistinguishable from the pile. "Look Sir thats my bag over there ! Yes the orange one. That was easy wasn't it ?"
AVS lays it out from the agents side and I concur with their posting. A heavy book is nobodies friend. It needs to be manageable. My book is 16x16 square which may sound large but is not as hefty as it may seem. I shoot square 99% of the time and therefore my prints are, well you guessed it square. Up till this point I had been using an 11x11 format which I felt really wasn't giving my work the chance to breath. I am happy with the bigger size, it is working for me and I limit the number of pages to around 25 which works out at, yeah you guessed right 50 images. Oh and don't forget what the final dimensions of your book will be when its open. Will it fit on a regular desk or will you need a steel reinforced conference table. So mine opens to 16x32 not so bad. I have seen some of the infamous monster books out there, 20x24 and bigger but I wouldn't openly encourage that sort of behaviour.
Mine is standard House of Portfolios fare, straight forward name embossed black cover with plastic sleeves. I have, as we all do from time to time considered ditching the sleeves for some mounted prints or Epsons and have seen such books but to be honest mine get so much ware and tear I just cant bear to be so precious both emotionally and financially. I am already eating it with replacement pages as they run $ 3.00 each.
Keep the pages clean and always check their condition each time you get the book back. If you have an agent they will probably take care of this and replace your pages for you. I once interviewed with a rep who said he replaced the first and last page every send out no matter, they are the ones that take much of the beating. Note to self now that I am self-represented don't let scruffy pages hold me down. I have had my books come back with the prints rearranged and out of order from time to time, thats a good thing right ? Means someone went to the trouble to take them out and copy them me thinks ?
"Before sending the book back I always make sure and huck a promo in the trash. Photographers seem to like that better than my previous practice of not grabbing one." A Photo Editor
Wow APE is fuckin honest with that remark so in return be honest with yourself as I am being with myself how many times have you counted the promos in the back of the book before the drop off only to count them when you get it back and been relieved that one/some are magically gone. Yeah baby, score ! Well myth fuckin busted, if APE is doing it, there may be others. Although a leave behind note no matter how generic is always a treat. See earlier post here on the portfolio drop off.
All editors have inspiration walls in their offices/cubicles adorned with favorite promos and prints. This is where your promo needs to go, if not its hidden in the bottom of a drawer at best garbage at worst. If you are lucky enough to get an in house meeting be sure to be all over that wall with your eagle eye scoping out what tickles their fancy. Do your homework, might come in handy down the line.
Remember APE is giving us the magazine perspective and I appreciate his/her fondness for the web but I have heard from other editors that they prefer to see books and print quality can seal the deal particularly if it is someone they haven't yet worked with. So there are no hard and fast rules its still a matter of personal preference.
Books though are still particularly valid when it comes to advertising as they are the main go to. Sure art buyers and creatives will hit your site but they call portfolios in for review, especially when you are under consideration for a campaign. And remember some of the bigger agencies have huge offices so no one will want to be lugging a 20lb book around from meeting to meeting.
First impressions are everything, whether it be yourself or your book. Maybe think like an editor or an art buyer from time to time. Be open and honest with yourself no matter what point you may be at in your career, perhaps some of the nuggets on APE or AVS might pertain to you as they have to me, there are always new lessons to be learnt.
Hey APE while we are at it and now that I am representation free whats your feeling on agents, are they a help or a hindrance, do you prefer to deal with them or the photographer direct and if you are not so keen on an agency in general does that taint your view of the individual talent. Does it help your cause if you are on an uber roster. Do you feel more safe and secure if the photographer has a safety blanket of support or do you just not care. Oh and do you huck agency promos in the trash too ! I would love to hear about your experiences and I think it may be enlightening. Any advice and insight would be appreciated as I go through my own transition. I don't think you have really posted heavily on this topic yet.
Wednesday, November 21
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
One of your points reminded me: In advertising, the decision makers are often CD's and/or Clients. The AD and AB need to make a sale; why is this guy your first choice, etc. So keep in mind, your book is going to be next to several others from top shooters, it had better be stellar.
I am one of those mofos who has a giant book. It is about 16X20 with 75 pages and has a monster case. I think it weigh 25lbs and cost $125 to fedex. I guess the only way to justify it is to say I feel like my images especailly the landscapes look better big and are about the same size as a magazine spread.
Back when I had an agent (10 days ago) she always talked about how important the book was and how it was the most important sales tool she had.
I've been wondering about the agent deal as well. It seems to me that a photographer like Terry Richardson shouldn't need an agent. Maybe this no so busy photographer just doesn't see it through the eyes of you NY hotshots...jk
please, no more posts about portfolios, anything but portfolios ! So, how about periwinkle majordomos, conventional politicos, pre-digested spaghetti-Os but please, no more porto-fo-lios....!
I beg you- O
bruce
good point, the client ultimately has the final say, its their money
I hope this stuff doesnt sound too photo 101 but some people out there are looking for pointers and I hope my experience is somewhat useful for those looking
hope I dont sound like a preacher or chase jarvis
as Homer would say: " hummm, chase jarvis"....
ThomasBroening - I'm not sure that the large portfolio is a bad thing. Sure - everyone complains that it's heave, it costs more and may seem pointless at times ... BUT, on a boardroom table, I'm not sure I want my book next to yours as elegant as it may be at 11x14. The art buyer may be cursing you out but are they the decision maker?
It's not photo 101 - the topic evolves, its one of our major expenses, and it's THE most critical sales tool - still. For those who've committed already it's of little interest but if you're designing a new one, I'll bet you're reading these posts no matter how long you've been in business.
Bruce
I do agree, I sure wouldn't want to be up against Thomas either. A client will look at his book in a completely different way, yeah bring on the weight, the experience, the great work.
Your stuff got to look good big if you go big, doesnt work for everyone but I think a lot of photographers end up that way eventually after trial and error, I did, and then you have decent volume of work to pull from too.
One burning question, prints or tearsheets?
Timmy
My main books are prints - I do have a tear sheet book I send out from time to time as well as the main book depending
I usually bring it with me if I have a meeting and wait to see how things are going as to whether I whip it out
It can be a help or a hindrence and with all things it comes down to an editors prefrance
I do not send my editorial tear book to advertising clients
Oh and your tears should be good, no need to show tears if the picture choice or layout is weak, no one wants to see a book of published thumbnails either
Tearsheets or prints:
If you are one of those seasoned pros who have 3-5 great campaigns that are well designed award winners, I'd say show them front and center.
For the rest of us, mediocre designed ads or tear sheets with great photography will look like mediocre designs to AD's and GD's. IMHO - stick with good photography. Knock their eyes out and don't distract them with ads that good art directors and clients may dislike.
I do, however, show mostly work with which the client prospect can relate. I don't usually show fine art or personal work. Be aware - many think I am wrong for not showing personal work. I'm not so sure. Any thoughts?
Post a Comment